Amazon Amanda is Larger model - Profile, Video

Larger than life model Amanda Soule, who is 6ft 3ins, 20 stone and boasts enormous 44DD breasts, is a massive hit with blokes who like big women

Amazon Amanda With Client

Every job requires a certain amount of professionalism for it adds value to the service.

With an imposing 20 stone figure that could quite literally crush a man to death, Amazon Amanda  is no ordinary model. Boasting a 44DD bust, 63 inch hips and towering 6ft 3ins frame, the 38-year-old is a huge hit with with men who like being sat on, squashed, crushed, wrestled, or simply seen out in pubic with super-sized women. She once even refused a request by a terminally ill client to squash him to death. After growing too big to be a mainstream model, Las Vegas-based Amanda - real name Amanda Soule - discovered a subculture where she could put her huge natural assets to good use.


Just like the original Amazons - mythical female warriors - Amanda is an imposing figure. She has over 6,000 followers on her Twitter page, where she describes herself as, "Amazon by height, BBW by size and goddess by nature". Despite the suggestive nature of her work, Amanda insists nothing sexual ever takes place between her and her clients.

Kajal Aggarwal Interview

I'm not desperate to get married, says Kajal Aggarwal

Actress Kajal Aggarwal is in the news now for performing the Rahu Ketu pooja at Sri Kalahasthi temple recently. And the buzz was that she sought divine intervention because she wanted to do 'parihara' as her younger sister, actress Nisha, got married ahead of her, and some of her recent works in films have come in for criticism.

Ask the actress about this, and she laughs,
"Some of my cousins from the US, who had come down for the wedding, wanted to visit Tirupati, and I went to the temple along with my family. Sri Kalahasthi is just an hour from there, and we thought it would be good for us to go there as well. We went as a gang, and performed small poojas. This has nothing to do with my characters in the film not being appreciated or that my films weren't doing well. I'm very happy that my sister got married to the guy she had been dating. And, I'm not desperate to get married. I'm happy where I am." 

But, does criticism about her performance in her recent films or the fate of her films at the BO affect her?
"I enjoyed shooting for all the films that I have done and have no regrets. In Jilla, I played a cop for the first time, and had the opportunity to work with a legend like Mohanlal and an actor like Vijay. I can't argue with the director and ask or more screen time because the film is his vision. And, in All In All Azhagu Raja, I had a full-on comic character, something that I haven't given a shot at before," she justifies, "Criticism doesn't affect me — it actually helps me understand what the audience like. Everyone makes mistake, and it's important you learn from them." 

After Singham and Special 26, the actress hasn't signed any film in Bollywood. Why's that?
"I did get offers, but nothing was appealing. I currently have two scripts in hand, and I'll decide on them soon," she states.

Back in Tamil, she will be starting work on her film with Balaji Mohan.
"It's a fun romantic film. I play a city-bred girl in it, and we are planning to go on floors with the film from May," she says, "I also have a film in Telugu with Krishna Vamsi and Ram Charan. I've worked with the two of them earlier, and it will be fun to shoot with them together." 

There was also a buzz that she was in talks to do Nanbenda with Udhayanidhi Stalin, a role that finally went to Nayanthara.
"Film for which you are in talks might not always materialize. I was in discussion to do Udhay's fillm, but it didn't work out. Similarly, I was approached for a film with Kamal Haasan long back, but I couldn't do it because of date issues. These things keep happening," she signs off.

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Kiran Kumar Reddy Interview

Telangana: Congress should respect assembly's sentiments on Telangana Bill, says Kiran Kumar Reddy

The Central government is behaving like the representative only of Telangana, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Kiran Kumar Reddy said on Thursday after the state legislature rejected the AP Reorganisation Bill 2013.

"It was an unopposed resolution rejecting the Bill," Reddy told Headlines Today in an exclusive interview.

Attacking the Congress leadership for trying to carve out a separate state from Andhra Pradesh, he said: "The party should respect sentiments of people and the assembly".

"We are in a democracy, not in a dictatorship. Once you are calling Congress an inclusive party, you should respect the views," Reddy, a Congress legislator, said. "Let the people of AP take a decision on the way forward in the elections."

He said he would take the demand to keep Andhra united to Delhi.

"We will take the fight to Delhi. The President has to take cognisance of the sentiments of the people. I'm confident it (the Bill) will not go to Parliament," he said.

Reddy made news on Wednesday after he threatened to quit politics if the Telangana Bill was tabled in parliament.

"I have put the future of AP ahead of my career," he said.

"Power sharing, water sharing and medical facilities are big problems. Unfortunately central govt is behaving like the representatives only of Telangana. They have not studied the issue in detail. The Bill is full of mistakes."

Reddy admitted that his relationship with the party's High Command was strained. "They would not like what I'm doing. I have been told that they do not like what I am doing," he said.

He said the rejection of the Bill in the AP legislature should be taken note of by the central government.

"If feelings of the House do not have place in democracy, then god only can save our democracy," he said.

"I'm the 16th CM of AP. I hope there will even be a 17th, 18th and 21st CM of united AP," Reddy said.

source: indiatoday.intoday.in

Sushilkumar Shinde calls RK Singh’s allegations politically motivated

RK Singh and Sushilkumar Shinde

420 riot victims shifted from Muzaffarnagar relief camp to “His (RK Singh) accusations are baseless and are politically motivated,” Shinde told media.
This is the first public response made by the Home Minister after Singh alleged that Shinde had interfered in the probe into betting scam in IPL and prevented Delhi Police from questioning a businessman close to India's most-wanted criminal Dawood Ibrahim.

In his interview to TV channels, Singh had claimed that Delhi Police was stopped by Shinde from questioning a Mumbai-based businessman, who is said to have "some kind of links" with Dawood Ibrahim, in connection with the betting in Indian Premier League, a T-20 cricketing tournament.
Singh also attacked Shinde, saying that he is not fit to be the Home Minister and Finance Minister P Chidambaram is "100 times better" than him.
"Singh is now a political man. His allegations are political in nature. He is now with BJP. I do not see him as a former home secretary but as a BJP man. I will not react to his allegations," he told reporters here.
   
Singh joined BJP in December of last year and may contest the Lok Sabha polls from Bihar.
   
Shinde said his Congress party and ministerial colleagues had already reacted to Singh's allegations.

Congress has questioned the "opportunistic" and "low" behaviour of the officer.
   
Party general secretary Digvijay Singh claimed that the former home secretary had tried to get a post-retirement position from UPA.
   
"Shocked at the opportunistic behaviour of RK Singh, ex HS. Why did he not bring this to the notice of the Cabinet Secretary or the PM ?
   
"Is it not a fact that he tried to get a post-retirement position from UPA? Is it not a fact that he had approached Nitish (Kumar) for a position?," Digvijay had said on Twitter.
   
I&B Minister Manish Tewari, too, has asked why the bureaucrat had not spoken up earlier.
   
Tewari criticized what he said was a tendency after retirement among bureaucrats to speak out against their former bosses.
   
"I think it is extremely unfortunate. You have this very pernicious tendency of bureaucrats after retirement trying to make allegations in order to occupy media space," Tewari had said. If Singh, or anybody else, was really so concerned, then why was not the matter put on record while they were in service, Tewari had asked.

‘Pakistan’s strongest weapon is the weapon of denial’

Pakistan has a new Army Chief in Gen. Raheel Sharif. In this interview, Lt. Gen. Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd), who was commander of the Srinagar-based 15 Corps and retired as military secretary, talks to Sridhar Kumaraswami about what the new appointment could mean for India as well as  Pakistan.

Why do you think Pakistan Prime Mini-ster Nawaz Sharif picked Gen. Raheel Sharif to succeed Gen. Kayani as Army Chief over more senior officers? 

Gen. Sharif is the younger brother of an iconic deceased military figure who happened to be a batchmate of Pervez Musharraf. When Raheel Sharif was commissioned in 1976, we learn that Mr Musharraf took him under his wing. As such, it’s a surprise actually that PM Sharif selected an Army Chief who is a protégé of
Mr Musharraf. How­ever, Gen. Sharif was a commander of the 11 Infantry Division in Lahore and 30 Corps in Gujranwala, which is the heart of (Pakistani) Punjab. So he must have come into very close contact with the (Nawaz) Sharif family. That is probably how he developed that comfort level with the current political dispensation in Pakistan. Besides, Gen Sharif has neither served with the Inter-Services Intel-ligence nor with the Operations/Intell­igence Direct­orate. In his last assignment, he dealt with training and doctrinal aspects. The doctrinal study on counter-insurgency has probably been authored by him. There is a Pakistani writer who recently mentioned that Gen. Sharif does not have the personality of an Army Chief who would lead the nation into a war. I feel that Gen. Sharif in his time will mature, and find his own place among equals. I discount theories that he is not aggressive and not capable. He is an infantry officer with a good operational orientation and cerebral capability and has the right political backing.

Under Gen. Sharif do you think there can be a reversal of Gen. Kayani’s confrontationist policy on the Line of Control?

This year there have been several infringements of the ceasefire. It is very important for Pakistan to try and keep the fire of disgruntlement burning in Kash-mir. There are fewer than 250 terrorists in the Kashmir Valley now. Pakistan probably thou-ght if it does not act now, its ability to calibrate turbulence in the valley will be severely compromised. In late 2012, Pakistan probably decided that the LoC has to be re-activated because the Indian Army had its focus on the Jammu and Kashmir hinterland and was succeeding in moulding public opinion towards itself in a positive way. Many militant leaders were eliminated in focused coun-ter-terrorist operations. This is what was worrying the Pakistan Army. Given this, I don’t think there can be a drastic change towards J&K and towards India (as a whole). I don’t think anyone heading the Pakistan Army can take an overnight decision to suddenly switch off Kashmir. In the next six months, I don’t expect any change in policy.
The Pakistan Army has been brought up on a diet of anti-Indianism. This basic orientation of the Pakistan Army will not change.

Pakistan’s modified military doctrine war-ns of a disproportionate response vis-à-vis India. 

India’s doctrine of Cold Start (now called Proactive Strategy) — to address the problem of our slow mobilisation — has never really been enunciated. It, of course, worried Pakis-tan and they permanently moved some of their formations to more appropriate locations closer to the border. Earlier, Pakistan was able to mobilise forces much faster compared to India. Pakistan then decided to bring some offensive formations south of the Chenab. It also decided to adopt a policy of “react first and mobilise later”.
This is a very major change in the doctrine of Pakistan whereby Pakistan will rely on sw­ift and potent reaction with what is available and then supplement it with mobilisation.
Should this not succeed, as a last act of desperation, Pakistan cou-ld well resort to the use of tactical nuclear weapons, a capability it is keenly developing. And there is an assumption that in any fallout with India, the Afghan border will be downplayed. One-third of their brigades are on the Afghan border. These will be brought back. They appear to have some kind of understanding with the Taliban that in case of any conflict with India, the Taliban will switch off and allow the Pakistan Army to react to the Indian Army.

How would you react to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s statement — that Pakistan cannot win a war against India — which was made in response to a comment from the Pakis-tan Prime Minister which has since been denied?

Pakistan’s strongest weapon is the weapon of denial. We should not be naive. PM Sharif’s purported statement — that Kashmir is a flashpoint and can trigger a fourth war with India — was part of political gamesmanship. Such aggressive verbal posturing is usual when a Pakistani Prime Minister visits Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. However, it is very significant that our Prime Minister has reacted to it. His message was unambiguous — that Pakistan cannot meddle militarily with India and ever hope to succeed. I think it was required and has effectively conveyed our stance. Mr Sharif may have been testing the waters.

How do you see the current civil-military relations in Pakistan.

The Pakistan Army’s relationship with the civilian government should pan out positively. The Pakistan Army does not want to take up governance of the country. It has too much on its hands already.

What will be the Pakistan Army’s stra-tegy on its western border and Afghanis-tan ahead of the pullout of foreign troops next year?

Pakistan is looking at stability. The Pakistan Army’s strategy is to weaken the Pakistani Taliban. It is not easy to defeat such an insurgency. The strategy would be to stabilise and to prevent further radicalisation. For Pak-istan, it is important to engage with Afghanis-tan and to ensure that no factor perceived to be hostile is allowed to germinate in its backyard.

Some say the situation in Afghanistan has to be closely monitored in the context of infiltration into Kashmir. 

I don’t think there will be any sudden and sh­a­rp influx into J&K after the pullout of foreign troops from Afghani­stan. The Indian Army is alert on the LoC. However, Pakistan will continue moral and material support to separatism in Jammu and Kashmir with the p
ossibility of keeping the LoC active to facilitate infiltration, as it has done in the past.

General Syed Ata Hasnain, Short Profile

Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM, SM (BAR), VSM (BAR) is a retired Indian Army General Officer. His last assignment in service was as the Military Secretary of the Indian Army. Prior to that, he commanded an Army Corps in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, amongst other appointments.
source: deccanchronicle.com

Cricketer Baba Aparajith Interview

I got out at the wrong time, says Aparajith

India 'A' opener Baba Aparajith said losing his wicket before the batting powerplay led to the hosts' 45-run defeat in the third unofficial ODI against the West Indies 'A' on Thursday.  Victory for the visitors resulted in a 2-1 series win over the formidable India A side. Aparajith, who scored a half century in his first game of the series, said his dismissal came at a wrong time.  "Powerplay was important but before that I got out... that did not help," he said at the post-match press conference at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium.

Aparajith said he didn't put pressure on himself and followed his process to tide over an usual nervousness in the beginning.  "I just tried to enjoy," he added. He also said it was easier to bat along side skipper Yuvraj Singh.  Describing his style of batting, Aparajith said he likes to play long innings.  Meanwhile, West Indies A captain Kieran Powell lauded the efforts of Kirk Edwards who smashed a match-winning century, that paved the way for his side's 2-1 series clinching victory in the unofficial ODI series.

"He (Edwards) knew if he bats deep into the innings, he will get an hundred and that's what the team needed, and he did it and other guys batted around him, which helped us clinch the series in the decider," Powell said.  Powell said the visitors executed their plans brilliantly in last two games after losing the series opener. Asked about the positives to derive from the series, Powell said: "Lot of youngsters are there in the team and the series win augurs well for West Indies cricket."

On his personal form after two bad performances in the series, Powell said the ploy to play positively worked wonders for him and he hoped to continue in the same vein in the one-off Twenty20 match to be played on Saturday.

Hyderabad Should Be UT Or Permanent Joint Capital: Chiranjeevi Interview

Chiranjeevi today said Hyderabad should be made a Union Territory or the permanent joint capital of both the states

Appearing reconciled to the decision to carve Telangana state out of Andhra Pradesh, Congress leader and Union Tourism Minister K Chiranjeevi today said Hyderabad should be made a Union Territory or the permanent joint capital of both the states. Actor-turned-politician Chiranjeevi, who hails from coastal Andhra region, is not inclined to quit the government as he argues that he can work for addressing the problems of Andhra and Rayalaseema regions by being in "power".

"I feel power is needed to argue on behalf of the people. To get things implemented for them in Seemandhra. If I cannot get things done for them, if I cannot fulfill their aspirations, then I will think of resigning," he told PTI here when asked if he would quit over Telangana decision considering that some other ministers had offered to do so. The decision of the Congress earlier this week to create Telangana state has triggered widespread protests, including resignations by at least seven Congress MPs and several MLAs from Andhra and Rayalaseema regions.

Four Union Ministers -- Pallam Raju, D Purandeshwari, K Kruparani and J D Seelam -- had offered to resign but were persuaded by the Congress high command against doing it. Asked about the contentious issue of Hyderabad, Chiranjeevi said, "life revolves around Hyderabad, be it infrastructure, location or what not. It is in the interest of people that either it should be a Union territory or a common capital permanently, not for 10 years." As per the Congress decision, Hyderabad is to be the common capital of both Andhra and Telangana for 10 years. By this time, a new capital will be identified and developed for Andhra.

Narendra Modi speaks About 2002 Gujarat riots

Gujarat CM under fire for his 'insensitive' puppy analogy on the 2002 riots.Identifying himself as a Hindu nationalist, Gujarat chief minister and BJP prime ministerial hopeful Narendra Modi sparked off a major political controversy on Friday by using a puppy-analogy to explain how the 2002 riots in his state saddened him. On being asked if he regretted what happened under his watch 11 years ago, Modi replied that he had been given a “thoroughly clean chit” by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by the Supreme Court.

He said: “Another thing, any person if we are driving a car, we are a driver, and someone else is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course, it is. If I’m a chief minister or not, I’m a human being. If something bad happens anywhere, it is natural to be sad.” Coming from Modi, it was a significant statement. The chief minister made it clear that he was not a politician who would soften his stance and say he was sorry.

He has never said sorry for 2002 and there was no change from that position. All he did was to say that he was saddened by the incident. He even played down the seriousness of the events of 2002 by comparing it with a puppy coming under a car.

The brief interview was used by Modi to make a careful political construct that he is a hardcore Hindu leader. No, he did not repeat the Ayodhya temple agenda. He had left that task in the hands of the now UP-in-charge of the party and his close aide, Amit Shah. On secularism he said: “For me, my secularism is India first. I say the philosophy of my party is ‘Justice to all. Appeasement to none’. This is our secularism.” He made it explicit that he was not going to lose his polarised Hindu vote by sounding placatory towards the Muslims.

When asked how he would persuade minorities, including Muslims, to vote for him, he replied: “First thing to Hindustan’s citizens, to voters Hindus and Muslims, I’m not in favour of dividing. I’m not in favour of dividing Hindus and Sikhs. I’m not in favour of dividing Hindus and Christians. All the citizens, all the voters are my countrymen... Religion should not be an instrument in your democratic process.”

He underlined the fact that he was a Hindu nationalist. He offered the explanation that having been born a Hindu and being a patriot, he would always end up being a Hindu nationalist. He said: “I’m nationalist. I’m patriotic. Nothing is wrong. I’m a born Hindu. Nothing is wrong. So, I’m patriotic, so nothing is wrong in it. As far as progressive, development-oriented, workaholic, whatever they say, that it what they are saying. So there’s no contradiction between the two. It’s one and the same image.”

There was not much politically surprising about what Modi said. That he identified himself as a Hindu nationalist with eight months left for the polls is significant. That he stood firm on his ground on secularism or on 2002 suggests that he would continue to play hardline Hindutva politics and mix it with his growing focus on development. Non-BJP politicians pounced upon Modi for using the puppy analogy. SP leader Kamal Farooqui said: “It is a very sad, very humiliating and very disturbing statement. What does he think that Muslims are worse than puppies. He should apologise. Said CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat: “The expression of regret just doesn’t come to Modi. There is something fundamentally wrong with what he is saying.”

Shivanand Tewari of the JD(U) said: “Modi should be subjected to a psycho-analysis”. He said that it would be a “very dangerous situation if such a person becomes the prime minister of the country.” Salman Khurshid, external affairs minister, commented, “Modi has a poor impression of the Indian people, to be a Hindu nationalist is an oxymoron.”

Sunny Leone's Interview

Sunny Leone's affair with India

As a top-rated porn star in the US, Sunny Leone had perhaps never imagined she could have "moved" to Bollywood as "easily" as she did. But she is glad that the industry is "accepting" her while she tries to "fully crack the code".

We bring you a few excerpts from her interview:

A lot has happened to your career in Bollywood since we last spoke. How do you feel about the changes in your life and career?
This has been the most amazing transition that I could hope for. Being accepted and liked in another country is not something that happens all the time.

How accepting has Bollywood been of you? Do you feel completely at home here?
Bollywood has been very accepting. I know there are people out there that don't like me but there are more people liking me so it doesn't bother me. I am very lucky that when I entered Bollywood, I was coming with a fan-following already. And the 'Bigg Boss 5' show helped everyone else get to know me as a person. Moving to India from Hollywood was one of the easiest moves I have ever made. Effortless really.

How much of the Indian film industry have you so far come to terms with?
I'm not sure I fully understand this question. But I grew up in typical Punjabi home and watched Hindi movies during my childhood. I understand Hindi and Punjabi and the Indian film industry is like every entertainment industry across the world. It all functions the same just in a different language. I have moved my whole world here and love this industry of Bollywood.

Do you feel it's hard for an outsider like you to crack the Bollywood code?
I work very hard and around the clock trying my hardest to learn everything that Bollywood is. I'm not even sure if I have fully cracked the 'code', but I've begun the process hopefully. It all depends on how my second, third and fourth movie do. In all reality, I have only made one movie that has been released to the world. It all depends on how the world accepts me in those movies to come.

Your next project is Ekta Kapoor's "Ragini MMS 2"? How comfortable are you in the horror genre?
Honestly, I loved working on this film. There is a lot of performance in this movie and a huge range of emotions and, of course, horror. I don't mind the idea of not looking pretty in every shot. To me, this is my way of getting out of who I am and becoming someone completely different for the day.

Are you now a full-on Mumbai girl? Have you and your husband settled down in Mumbai?
I feel very comfortable living here and it's been the easiest move for he and I. We're very much settled and know the in's and out of Mumbai. I think the day I felt totally comfortable was when I started giving my driver directions.

Have you left your days as an adult star behind? How do you look back on that experience?
If it wasn't for my past, I would not be who I am. I am not ashamed of it because it has brought me here to India. If I came here as regular me with no entertainment experience then, I would not be as popular as I am today with the public.

How do you react to a director like Anees Bazmi saying he wouldn't want to work with you as he has a family audience to consider?
I have no idea what this is all about. But I am very lucky that there are plenty of people that want to work with me.

Is it true your husband Daniel is also seeking a career in Bollywood?
My husband is entertaining several opportunities and for information you'll have to ask him.
source